Search for: "Voter v. Voter" Results 161 - 180 of 6,660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court Hears Trump v. Anderson: What To Expect
8 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by jonathanturley
Jason Murray, who is representing Republican voters who want to disqualify Trump. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
:@WilliamBaude: The Facts Matter, Trials Matter, The Record Matters
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Will Baude
In Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm by Marty Lederman
    For example, a state may require that a candidate or a party have made “a showing of a modicum of support among the potential voters for the office,” Munro v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Seven: Trump’s Two Remaining “Off-Ramp” Arguments: (i) That Colorado has Implemented a De Facto Extraconstitutional Presidential Qualification, in Violation of Term Limits v. Thornton; and (ii) That Colorado has Abused its Article II Authority to Appoint Presidential Electors in a “Manner” of Appointment that Colorado Law Doesn’t Authorize
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm by Marty Lederman
    For example, a state may require that a candidate or a party have made “a showing of a modicum of support among the potential voters for the office,” Munro v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
The U.S. is no Longer a "Mature Democracy": Implications for Trump's Ballot Eligibility
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Certainly the momentousness of, say, Bush v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Six: The Two “Off-Ramp” Arguments Based Upon In re Griffin’s Case that Would Allow the Supreme Court to Avoid Deciding Whether Trump is Eligible to be President
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  Moreover, regardless of Colorado’s objectives, a ballot exclusion of Trump in the Colorado primary not only wouldn’t affect his ability to hold office—it wouldn’t even affect whether Colorado Republican voters could vote for him; whether the Republican Party would have to recognize Colorado delegates “allocated” to another candidate because of the ballot exclusion; or whether the Republican Party nominates Trump for President in July. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Expelled White Student's Suit Against Howard Law School Largely Dismissed, but Can Go Forward on Some Claims
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am by Eugene Volokh
A short excerpt from today's long decision by Judge Trevor McFadden (D.D.C.) in Newman v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Tune into one of the most important arguments in decades: Trump v. Anderson
6 Feb 2024, 7:35 am by Marcia Coyle
Link: Listen to Live Arguments at the Court The case, Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
Explaining Donald Trump’s 14th Amendment case at the Supreme Court
5 Feb 2024, 9:59 am by Scott Bomboy
Trump v. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
The Bounded Triumph of Health Care Ballot Initiatives
4 Feb 2024, 9:03 pm by Katie Cohen
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
RegBlog - https://www.theregreview.org/
Bruce Ackerman Misunderstands My Point About What Colorado is Doing and May Do
4 Feb 2024, 7:55 pm by Marty Lederman
 See Perry v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] In Trump v. Anderson, the Respondents' Theory Would Render Unconstitutional Every Speaker and President Pro Tempore Since 1789, as Well as President Grant's VP and Presidential Candidate George McGovern
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
On appeal to the Supreme Court, the Colorado voters in Trump v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection That Enforcing Section Three Would Be Too "Dangerous"
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am by Will Baude
  The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
:@WilliamBaude: The Objection that Enforcing Section Three is "Undemocratic"
3 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Will Baude
Trump's fitness for office left to the voters to decide. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Part Four: Trump’s Argument That His Tenure as President Did Not Subject Him to Section 3 Because the President is Not an “Officer of the United States”
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Supreme Court to decide whether insurrection provision keeps Trump off ballot
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Prof. Marty Lederman (Georgetown) on Trump v. Anderson: "Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, …"
2 Feb 2024, 8:50 am by Eugene Volokh
See Perry v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
A User’s Guide to Trump v. Anderson, Interim Post: Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t Address
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
M'Clung v. [read post]
Balkinization - http://balkin.blogspot.com/
Federal judge blocks California law requiring background checks for ammunition purchases
1 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm by Chris Rufo | New England Law | Boston, US
US District Judge Roger Benitez based his decision on the US Supreme Court’s holding in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
The Biden Administration Must Use Civil Rights Enforcement to Push Back Against Texas’s Racist Invocation of Invasion
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Kate Huddleston
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/