Search for: "WILSON v. DOE et al" Results 161 - 180 of 203
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Skelos, et al., Respondents, vDavid Paterson, & c., et al., Appellants. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
Wilson IV (Wilson, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:49 am
Docket: 08-327 Title: Arizona, et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:17 pm
  The government opposition brief, filed Monday  in Plame Wilson, et al., v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 2:30 am
Tuesday on Safford Unified School District, et al., v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 12:20 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
West Hawaii Today reports on yesterday's oral arguments in the Supreme Court of Hawaii in County of Hawaii v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 11:54 pm
In a study of E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks from 1982-2002, the authors estimated that half of the produce-associated outbreaks were due to produce already contaminated with E. coli O157 before purchase by the retail store or consumer (Rangel et al, 2005). [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
Wilson, et al, a 19-page opinion, Judge Crone writes:Ronald J. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]