Search for: "Wall v. State of California" Results 161 - 180 of 1,400
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm by Ilya Somin
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:22 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court to butt out of their dispute with Arizona over how California imposes its taxes on some of this state’s residents and businesses. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:39 pm
Thus, a ruling by a California state trial court, granting summary judgment to Domino’s on the injured employee’s claims, was reversed.The injured employee claimed that both the franchisee and Domino’s were the employers of the harassing employee and were vicariously liable for his actions under the doctrine of respondeat superior. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 3:36 am by Amy Howe
” In the California Lawyer, Traci Park anticipates the Court’s decision in Elonis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
In the Wall Street Journal, Mark H. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:45 am by Melanie Notari and Elizabeth G. Litten
Although HIPAA does not provide a private right of action, the lawsuit alleges negligence, invasion of privacy, and violations of three California state laws: (1) the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, (2) the California Consumer Records Act, and (3) California’s Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:58 am by Unknown
State of Utah (Jurisdiction)Ak-Chin Community v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
FentonThe Entry of Women into Wall Street Law Firms: The Story of Blank v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:56 am by Tom Smith
The ABA literally forced an unwilling law school to engage in preferential admissions, in violation of Grutter v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As reflected here, notwithstanding concurrent state court jurisdiction in the ’33 Act, the Luther v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Static Control Components and United States v. [read post]