Search for: "Walsh v. Means" Results 161 - 180 of 421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At Take Care, Jim Oleske explores the contested meaning of “general applicability” in the Supreme Court’s free exercise jurisprudence as it relates to the religion-clause issues in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 3:08 am
Massachusetts, in which the Court held that laboratory reports were “testimonial” within the meaning of Crawford v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
Madrid, a case about the meaning of “seizure” under the Fourth Amendment, and Pereida v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 3:35 pm
" Member Walsh concurred in the result but not the rationale. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 10:29 am
(Chairman Battista and Members Liebman and Walsh participated.) [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Quarles v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:43 pm
Prentky, Sexual Predator Laws: A Two-Decade Retrospective Mary Graw Leary, Kennedy v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” Mark Walsh has a first-hand view of all three of yesterday’s arguments for this blog. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 5:07 am by Amy Howe
At Education Week, Mark Walsh has the story on a PBS documentary on a Florida man who is seeking a new sentence in light of the Court’s 2010 decision in Graham v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Walsh (kwalsh@richmond.edu) is Professor of Law at the University of Richmond School of Law   [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 2:19 am by Edith Roberts
The first is in Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 6:59 am by James Bickford
  Today, the Court hears argument in McComish v. [read post]