Search for: "Washington Citizens Action of Washington v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2011, 9:20 am
Court of Appeals in San Francisco (2011-2 Trade Cases ¶77,615) recently held that parens patriae actions filed by the Attorneys General of Washington and California on behalf of their state citizens, alleging an LCD price fixing conspiracy in violation of state antitrust laws, did not constitute class actions under CAFA.In West Virginia ex rel. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am
Constitution (Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Regents of the University of Michigan, November 15, 2012, Cole, R). [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
First, Collyer invokes a formal, geographic point: The alleged decision, she writes, would have taken place in Washington, D.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:35 pm
In Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 8:27 am
Pequignot v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 6:25 am
” They are binding on all courts in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:51 am
” Respondent Robert Boule is a U.S. citizen who owns and runs the Smuggler’s Inn, a bed-and-breakfast abutting the Canadian border in Blaine, Washington; drives a car with a SMUGLER license plate; and worked as a confidential informant for the Customs and Border Patrol. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 10:57 pm
The big news yesterday out of Washington was the opinion in the Court's global warming case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:38 am
" The qui tam provision permits a private citizen to bring suit on behalf of the United States against persons who violate the FCA, and to keep some of the proceeds if she is successful. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:17 am
Yes, say two judges on a Washington Court of Appeals panel, in last week’s State v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:04 pm
Miller last year first said he wanted to fire LaFuente and replace him with a “sovereign citizens” organization based in Washington State. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 10:22 am
Yesterday's Washington Supreme Court decision in Stout v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule in a 1984 Washington, D.C., murder case. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
The District Court also found that the minimal diversity requirement was satisfied because the plaintiff is a citizen of California and Nordstrom is a citizen of Washington. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
In her column for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse weighs in on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:57 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 am
Whether or not the individual Justices viewed their actions this way at the time, many people saw Bush v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
State v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
However, the complaint describes a justiciable dispute, and it adequately states its causes of action. [read post]
