Search for: "Weeks v. McConnell"
Results 161 - 180
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2022, 9:00 pm
The Senate votes today on codifying Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 10:25 pm
Last week that Court decided Terry Mitchell v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 3:09 am
On September 8, 2003, the Court also held a special sitting to hear a predecessor case, McConnell v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am
” For this blog, Ronald Mann analyzes last week’s decision in Freeman v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:09 am
Humanitarian Law Project . . . (2010); McConnell . . . [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:41 am
Even without the omnibus, there's plenty of opportunity for legislative mischief as Congress winds up within the next week. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:49 am
Americans for Prosperity v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:05 pm
Mahanoy School Dist. v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:08 am
The National Immigration Law Center has an explainer on United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:55 am
Not to step on McConnell, who will be looking at Gianvito v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
" The June 2 date is significant because, according to Jan Crawford, the Chief Justice's proposed opinion was scheduled to be circulated on June 1.On the possibility of joint opinions, with parts divided among the justices: It's been done before, most notably recently in McConnell v. [read post]
New plot twist: CFPB agrees its structure is unconstitutional; Ballard Spahr to hold Oct. 22 webinar
19 Sep 2019, 10:36 am
The Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in March 2019 and last week directed the parties to file letter briefs regarding what action the Fifth Circuit panel should take in light of the en banc Fifth Circuit’s decision in Collins v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 9:56 am
Bush nominated John Roberts to replace Justice Sandra Day O’Connor within three weeks of her retirement on July 1, 2005. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:27 am
“Paul himself is calling his speech a filibuster, and with good reason: If he keeps talking long enough, he can upend Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s carefully laid plans for the week, prevent amendments to the trade bill, delay consideration of the surveillance legislation, and otherwise prevent his Senate colleagues from enjoying their holiday weekends,” said Mike DeBonis. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 5:30 am
Congress since 1856’s Brooks v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:40 am
Another view is the Cooper v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:51 pm
(That case is docketed as 06-614, Christian Civic League v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:09 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Frank Garrison weigh in on last week’s decision in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
