Search for: "Wells v. Lloyd" Results 161 - 180 of 646
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2020, 1:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Fourth, nuisance may be caused by inaction or omission as well as by some positive activity. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 28 to 30 January 2020 there will be a CMC in the phone hacking case of Various Claimants v MGN. [read post]
Brace yourself (for export turbulence) 2020 could well be a year of data export turmoil – so brace yourself! [read post]
Brace yourself (for export turbulence) 2020 could well be a year of data export turmoil – so brace yourself! [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Following last years post here is my selection of most notable privacy and data protection cases across 2019: Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 The data protection class action against Google which found that they are permissible in the case of DPA breaches for the Safari Workaround. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
The claimant in Lloyd v Google sought damages on behalf of a class of more than 4 million iPhone users affected by Google’s acquisition and use of information generated by their Safari browsers. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
The marks were therefore considered visually similar to an average degree.The signs were also considered conceptually similar since they both convey the concept of a whale.Assessment of the likelihood of confusionIt follows from the wording of Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR that the concept of a likelihood of association is not an alternative to that of a likelihood of confusion but serves to define its scope (C-342/97, Lloyd Schuhfabrik). [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am by INFORRM
 It appears that this is the first such action after the decision in Lloyd v Google earlier this month (see our post on the case). [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
They included the House Un-American Activities Committee and other McCarthyite organizations (including some within the Executive Branch); as well as the white men on the Alabama jury in New York Times v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 9:52 am by Giles Peaker
It would be a high risk tactic to rely on a ‘well, it wouldn’t have made any difference’ submission. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm by Arshan Barzani
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:46 am by Sally-Ann Underhill and Mira Midelieva
In any event, it considered that “there is nothing uncommercial in charterers being obliged to raise bona fide disputes timeously”, referring to authorities highlighting the crucial importance of cash flow to shipowners (see, inter alia, The Kostas Melas [1981] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 18). [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 9, 10 and 11 July 2019 there was a trial in the case of Boyo v Lloyds Bank Plc before Anthony Metzer QC (Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge). [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
In its statement of scope for the study, the CMA said: “We propose to examine the extent to which platforms’ market power might distort competition in digital advertising, as well as concerns around transparency and conflicts of interest in the intermediation of advertising”. [read post]