Search for: "Wells v. Payne" Results 161 - 180 of 199
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2014, 11:32 pm by Nietzer
But anything over this amount and the government may well make further inquiries. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
It may well be impossible to ascertain whether Mickey Mouse and Wolverine are competing properties at this time. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by SHG
  The Payne and Feingold decisions put an end to the common practice of double charging murder defendants with intentional and depraved indifference murder. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:57 am
  This changed with the Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
  Given their size and wealth I think that they are well able to do so. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton and Leslie C. Griffin
Cathedral kept its Catholic status by firing Payne-Elliott. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Alexander Payne, Note, Rebuilding the prevent defense: why unethical agents continue to score and what can be done to change the game, 13 VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF ENTERTAINMENT & TECHNOLOGY LAW 657 (2011)David Pepper, Comment, Anand v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am by familoo
I explained that I wanted to write a follow up post setting out what the Freedom of Information Act requests appeared to show, and making clear I wanted to write a well informed and fair piece on what had happened. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Scott Perry and the Assault on the 2020 Election Perry’s interference in the 2020 presidential election is well documented – including in media reporting, a Senate Judiciary Committee report in October 2021, and the Jan. 6 Select Committee’s final report. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Payne, No. 07-5592 In a conviction for multiple counts involving drugs, firearms, violence and multiple murders, court order authorizing involuntary medication treatment plan designed to restore defendant's competency to stand trial is affirmed over claims of error that the district court erred in finding that the evidence offered at the hearing was sufficient to establish that the proposed treatment is substantially likely to restore defendant's competency. [read post]