Search for: "Westchester County v. County of Westchester"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,098
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am
The Eikenberry Case A recent decision by Kings County Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman, Eikenberry v Lamson, 2020 NY Slip Op 33992(U) [Kings County Nov. 30, 2020], is a fine springboard for exploring the application of these legal standards to business divorce litigation where (as is often the case) the injunction movant’s ownership status in the business is hotly contested. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, opined that it "was not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, opined that it "was not so disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm
" It's impossible (I think) to square this with the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, the Appellate Division said that under the circumstances, the arbitrator's imposing the penalty of termination did not shock its sense of fairness. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, the Appellate Division said that under the circumstances, the arbitrator's imposing the penalty of termination did not shock its sense of fairness. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Coleman v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Julien Florez v. [read post]
$6.29 Million Jury Verdict in Failure to Diagnose and Treat Coronary Artery Disease Leading to Death
2 Sep 2020, 8:00 am
Kowher v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division indicated that its review of the matter was limited to whether DMV's determination was arbitrary and capricious, irrational, affected by an error of law or an abuse of discretion and, citing Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, noted that "An action may be said to be arbitrary if it lacks basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division indicated that its review of the matter was limited to whether DMV's determination was arbitrary and capricious, irrational, affected by an error of law or an abuse of discretion and, citing Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Scarsdale and Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, noted that "An action may be said to be arbitrary if it lacks basis in reason and is taken without regard to the facts. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
Collins v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
Serfass v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
* See Matter of Rogan v Nassau County Civ. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
* See Matter of Rogan v Nassau County Civ. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Bonness v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Anderson v. [read post]
