Search for: "White v. Johnson*"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,061
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2016, 11:12 am
Only one summary disposition involves criminal law.Kernan v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 5:14 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
The Court issued one decision yesterday, in United Student Aid Funds v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
Historian Thomas Aiello describes the origins of the statute in Bourbon Louisiana—a period when white Democrats sought to redeem their state after Reconstruction—its survival through the civil rights era of the 1950s and 1960s, and the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 7:18 am
White v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Community Assn. v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 1:41 pm
McDonald v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants' proffered explanations for not hiring or promoting the plaintiff to a certain position, and for, instead, promoting a white woman to that position, were a pretext for intentional racial discrimination (see Lefort v Kingsbrook Jewish Med. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
White, 890 F.2d at 1415; United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:45 am
The Louisiana Constitution provides (Article V, Sections 4 & 6) Section 4. [read post]
25 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm
In 2003 in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 7:01 am
Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Johnson v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:32 am
(Johnson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:09 am
Two of the plaintiffs also advanced their IIED and NEID claims (Thompson v. [read post]
