Search for: "Williams v. Heard" Results 161 - 180 of 1,914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 23-24 June 2022, there were applications in Piepenbrock v LSE before Heather Williams J. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Another notice of that LGBTQ archive at William & Mary (Virginia Gazette). [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Justice William Douglas’s dissent in Yoder is as important today as it was then, when he noted that “children are ‘persons’ within the meaning of the Bill of Rights,” and then said, “On this important and vital matter of education, I think the children should be entitled to be heard. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on the same day there was a statement in open court in the case of Begum Liza Shahinur v BBC before Heather Williams J. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  I often quote what I call “Roche’s dictum,” which I heard John P. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
IPSO 10091-21 Williams v Hull Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11209-21 Watson v Sunday Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021) 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 11246-21 Extinction Rebellion v The Spectator, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 00368-22 Thompson v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy… [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian reports that Heard plans to appeal. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 26 May 2022, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
Rowan Williams, The Telegraph (£): You do not have to be religious to oppose legalising assisted dying: in the week in which the BMA moved from outright opposition to neutrality. (13 September 2021). [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:45 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
Our last blog entry, UPC: four reasons on why the PPA is not legally in force, published on 21 April 2022, seems to have touched a nerve, as attested by the unprecedented number of comments received, for which this author is very grateful. [read post]
18 May 2022, 12:35 pm by Katherine Pompilio
   Rohini Kurup and Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:46 am by Russell Knight
Divorce judges have heard it all…and divorce judges are rarely, if ever, phased. [read post]
10 May 2022, 4:25 am by Emma Snell
Jordan Williams reports for The Hill. [read post]