Search for: "Wine v. Wine"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,638
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2013, 4:12 pm
See Southern Wine & Spirits, et al. v. [read post]
16 May 2005, 12:17 pm
The Supreme Court today handed down Granholm v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 4:52 am
In Gadsen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 3:37 am
Cesari S.R.L. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 8:49 am
A recent legal case, Consorzio di Tutela della Denominazione di Origine Controllata Prosecco v Australian Grape and Wine Incorporated [2023] SGCA 37, the Singapore Court of Appeal granted Consorzio’s application to register “Prosecco” as a Geographical Indication (“GI”) which designates wine originating from Italy. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:06 am
Juanita Swedenburg, the successful plaintiff in the interstate wine shipment case of Granholm v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 8:28 pm
The Eighth Circuit this week in Southern Wine and Spirits of America, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Oakville Hills Cellar, Inc., dba Dalla Valle Vineyards v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
Almeida v Arruda, 89 Mass App Ct 241, 241-48 (MA App. 3/18/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Non-Conforming Uses, Uncategorized [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 10:37 am
Delicato Vineyards v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:37 pm
The case is all about some counterfeit wine. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
at 15 (quoting McCarthy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
Select Wine Merchants Ltd. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 6:37 am
A few pieces: In the New York Times, Michael Wines has a piece, “Supreme Court to Hear Arguments on Far-Reaching Elections… Continue reading The post Some Moore v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:03 am
Township of Scott is available on the Supreme Court’s website; the transcript in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:52 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
”); and Rotkiske v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 11:02 am
., v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 7:28 am
Today, in Case T 237/08 Abadía Retuerta, SA v OHIM, the General Court (Third Chamber) became the second tribunal to dismiss its appeal against the refusal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to allow registration of its beloved trade mark CUVÉE PALOMAR for wines in Class 33. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:02 am
Constitution:A state's ban on retailer-to-retailer sales of beer and wine is not subject to preemption by the Sherman Act; A state's ban on use of a central warehousing system for delivery and storage of wine and beer is not preempted by the Sherman Act;A state's post-and-hold pricing system was subject to preemption by the Sherman Act;A post-and-hold pricing system was per se a violation of the Sherman Act;A post-and-hold… [read post]
