Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 1:06 pm
R (Elkundi) v Birmingham and R (Imam) v Croydon (2022) EWCA Civ 601 (not on Bailii yet. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:51 am
Walker v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm
If you oppose slavery (and Dred Scott), you should oppose Roe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am
In A v M, there are only a couple of paragraphs explaining Mostyn J’s position, and in BT v CU only a dozen or so. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am
Interestingly, Lord Briggs (who joined the majority), noted that “the simple test proposed by Lady Arden and Lord Burrows may occasionally involve the recognition of the equitable lien in wider circumstances than is strictly justified by its animating access to justice principle. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am
See also, in the landlord and tenant context, Chandless-Chandless v Nicholson (1942) 2 KB 321, 323 per Lord Greene MR. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 1:56 pm
This concept was described by Lord Briggs JSC in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd [2018] UKSC 21 as promoting access to justice, as it allows solicitors to provide litigation services on credit to clients with strong cases who do not have the financial means to pay upfront. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 3:15 am
In conclusion, Lord Briggs said “I consider that the right to manage scheme in Chapter 1 of Part 2 of the 2002 Act makes no provision within the statutory right to manage for management by the RTM company of shared estate facilities. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:51 am
Lord Briggs nevertheless went on to decide the second issue. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm
The appellant instead relied on O’Connor v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am
Quoting from both Lord Arbinger v Ashton [(1873) LR Eq 358 at 374] and Schneider NO and Others v AA and Another [2010 (5) SA 203 (WCC) at 211], the court re-iterated the position that, whilst there is no doubt some natural leaning on the part of an expert towards their paymasters, this does not in any way absolve the expert of the duty of impartiality and integrity. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 4:38 am
Dado, La Grande Ferme--Homage à Bernard Réquichot (1962-3); CentrePompidou It was my great honor to have been asked to participate in the brilliant Conference "The Life and Work of Robert M. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 10:55 am
R(N) v Lewisham London Borough Council (2015) AC 1259, confirms this change of stance in that Lord Hodge, with whom the majority of the Supreme Court agreed, approved the lesser connotation of the word “residence” as opposed to “dwelling” which suggested a greater degree of settled occupation. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 4:54 pm
Lord Dyson was unequivocal that such a complaint “was intended by Parliament to be adjudicated on by the specialist employment tribunals. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 5:39 pm
In assessing the opposing interests the word one finds repeated throughout the cases is the word “reasonable. [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm
This appeared immediately above a photograph of a street sign bearing the words “Bell End”. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:55 am
In section 26(5), the word “person” appears twice. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 9:59 am
” As noted by Lord Leggatt, English courts have traditionally applied the “same interest” test rigorously, particularly in light of the Court of Appeal’s key ruling in Markt & Co v Knight Steamship [1910] 2 KB 1021. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
In 2004, British Law Lord Johan Steyn famously called Guantanamo a “legal black hole. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:17 am
This interpretation reflected the ordinary and natural meaning of the word and was in accordance with the purpose of the tort gateway. [read post]