Search for: "York v. Federal Bureau of Prisons" Results 161 - 180 of 199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am by Beth Graham
  See, e.g., Ali v.Federal Bureau of Prisons, 552 U.S. 214, 219 (2008) (discussing cases and concluding “Congress’ use of “any” to modify “other law enforcement officer” is most naturally read to mean law enforcement officers of whatever kind”) (Thomas, J.); United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:22 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 99205 (SD NY, Sept. 21, 2010), a New York federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that a group strip search violated his free exercise rights and his rights under RLUIPA, finding insufficient evidence of a substantial burden on plaintiff's religious beliefs.In Garcia v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Mills faces up to five years in prison and a $50,000 fine per day of violation when he is sentenced on September 22, 2010. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Mills faces up to five years in prison and a $50,000 fine per day of violation when he is sentenced on September 22, 2010. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency, according to a joint status report filed yesterday in federal court. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:07 am by Timothy P. Flynn
The case of Ashcroft -v- Iqal involved the aftermath of the 9-11 terrorist attacks in 2001. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Click Here Prosecutor on Mancuso brothers: ‘They sunk themselves:’ Paul, Steven face prison time after jury finds them guilty in asbestos case. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:36 pm
Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:40 am
Plaintiff had since been transferred to a different facility and the Bureau of Prisons has rejected the Standardized Chapel Library Project policy responsible for the removal of the books. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:03 am
In this instance we are posting an appellant brief for the New York Sourt of Appeals Second Circuit case United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Issue:   Whether a federal court exercising its habeas jurisdiction, as confirmed by Boumediene v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:53 am
As the facility’s name indicates, the ADMAX SHU incorporates the maximum security conditions allowabl under Federal Bureau of Prison regulations. [read post]