Search for: "v. Holder et al" Results 161 - 180 of 924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2019, 11:14 am by Mitu Gulati
ABB et al., 768 F.3d 145 (2d Cir. 2014), the post-Saddam government of Iraq tried to disclaim responsibility for the previous government’s involvement in corrupt transactions. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
The second is the trajectory of the development of a robust Leninism that we have sometimes assumed is capable only of governance models in which power holders are essentially unaccountable. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:55 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Richard Prince et al., 1:16-cv-08896 and Graham v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
As some observers have suggested, for example, Roberts et al. might continue to issue rulings that amount to reversals of precedent without calling them reversals.The most widely discussed example of this would be for the Court not to overrule Roe explicitly (because that would energize even some otherwise conservative voters) but instead to decide that there simply are no abortion restrictions that constitute an “undue burden. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm by Howard Knopf
Moreover, there are no judicial precedents establishing liability on the part of an internet services account holder for someone else’s activity using that account, even if such activity may have infringed copyright. [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm by Kelsey Farish
Disney has responded to the copyright lawsuit lodged earlier this year in California by the Estate of Michael Jackson (MJJ Productions (et al) v Walt Disney Company and ABC INC). [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am by Ben
This in turn resulted in a lawsuit from Ms Paula White et al for copyright infringement. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
(Builds on scholars such as Sean Seymore and Ben Roin; see also Krieger et al. on drug novelty. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
Validity – Obviousness: Nichia Corporation, et al. v. [read post]