Search for: "*u.s. v. Chang" Results 1781 - 1800 of 24,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
That brings us to another serious question raised by this symposium  Why the focus on constitutional change? [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
”[8] This plunder disseminated worldwide, with thousands of artworks entering the collections of prominent cultural institutions in Europe and in the U.S.[9] Restituting art looted during the Holocaust not only returns stolen property to rightful owners but also restores cultural heritage and links to history for present generations. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:00 am by Chloe Reichel
Judith Daar on the future of IVF in a post-Dobbs U.S. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
But in the late 1980s and in the 1990s, this began to change. [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:48 pm by Ilya Somin
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 574 (2003) (quoting Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That women are the peculiar bearers of America’s constitutional failings seems obvious after Dobbs v. [read post]