Search for: "AT&T Communications" Results 1781 - 1800 of 127,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm by The Federalist Society
This case concerns whether a document from a state or local government stating that an application has been denied, but listing no reasons for the denial, can satisfy the Communications Act’s “in writing” requirement. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:30 am by azatty
Monroe Abbey column detail That may be a hard question, but I’m guessing it doesn’t involve your biggest financial windfall. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 3:44 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 In addition to the full refunds T-Mobile is providing, which will resolve the FTC’s lawsuit if approved by the court, T-Mobile is paying $18 million in fines and penalties to the attorneys general of all 50 states and the District of Columbia and $4.5 million to the Federal Communications Commission. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:00 pm by Oliver G. Randl
According to the established case law developed in relation to A 96(2) EPC 1973 and also applicable, as far as the issues raised by the appellant are concerned, to A 94(3), the expression “as often as necessary” in this article indicates that the ED has a discretion which has to be exercised objectively in the light of the circumstances of the case (see for instance decisions T 162/82 [12], T 300/89 [9.1], and T 726/04 [7]). [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Reference was made to the communication of 1 June 2011.[2.14] The Board disagrees. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:00 am by Ken Lopez
Again, a graphic illustration forms a clear depiction of a basic securities-law principle: One shouldn’t say one thing publicly while doing the opposite in private.By appealing to a juror's common sense and using litigation graphics, a trial team can persuade even the most financially ignorant in securities litigation. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
Usually an asset acquired with community property becomes community property. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm by Armand Grinstajn
R 2(1) provides for legal consequences in cases where documents are filed through non-approved technical means of communication (T 765/08 [9]). [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm by Armand Grinstajn
R 2(1) provides for legal consequences in cases where documents are filed through non-approved technical means of communication (T 765/08 [9]). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:11 am by Rees Morrison
Ironic, isn’t it, that this blogger, who tries hard to write clearly, admits to the impossibility of writing completely clearly. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm by Edward Granger
I think this shows how important it is to be involved in your respective blogging communities and interact with each other. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 12:07 pm by Edward Granger
I think this shows how important it is to be involved in your respective blogging communities and interact with each other. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
However, it refers to decision G 1/86 where the Enlarged Board (EBA) has provided a broad interpretation of the wording of A 122 [allowing] an opponent who has missed the time for filing the statement of grounds of appeal [to request re-establishment] (cf. the communication of the EPO in OJ EPO 2003, 419). [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:12 pm
The Communicator Awards is a leading international creative awards program that makes honoring creative distinction among professionals in the communication industry its priority. [read post]
17 May 2019, 2:57 pm by Britney Millisor
After all, … Continue reading → The post Don’t Let the Bed Bugs Bite! [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:50 am by craig
  If you let on that you may have trouble with that, you won’t get very far in an interview. [read post]
5 May 2012, 11:01 am by Oliver
Rather, under these circumstances and irrespective of whether or not the appellant explicitly maintains its request for OPs, it is within the discretion of the board to decide whether the scheduled OPs are to be maintained or to be cancelled (following T 910/02 [6]). [1.4] In the communication accompanying the summons, objections under, inter alia, A 52(1) in combination with A 56 were raised in respect of claim 1 of each request on file. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:17 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Unless there is any specific legislation that I don’t know about relating to postal supplies. [read post]