Search for: "Andrews v. State"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 4,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
However, this practice is now under threat in California because of the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in CTA v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:18 am
See Robnett v. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am
"] I blogged in February about the decision by Judge Andrew L. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 6:32 am
Andrew Michael Albert. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 10:34 am
Dawson Farms v. [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 9:12 am
Andrew is the author of "Are You a Canadian Injured in the United States? [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:05 am
Here is the complaint in Pawnee Nation v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:57 am
Posted by Andrew R. [read post]
2 May 2020, 6:55 am
Posted by Andrew R. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:32 pm
See McKellar v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
In the first article in this series I looked at the US approach to the role of the inventor in patent law and practice, and at the recent decision of Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) upholding the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that the ‘AI’ machine DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v… [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 3:41 am
Andrew Hirschfeld, Civ. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
United States, Maurer identified an argument that the parties, the amici, and the court did not make. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
Police say staff 97 per cent fully vaccinatedThe Supreme Court will take up the most important abortion case in 30 years as it considers a state's request to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 9:01 am
The defendants in U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:20 am
For the brief: https://www.eff.org/document/rios-v-united-states-eff-brief Tags: Locational PrivacyContact: AndrewCrockerStaff Attorneyandrew@eff.org [read post]
1 May 2015, 4:25 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard oral arguments in Glossip v. [read post]
