Search for: "BES v. State" Results 1781 - 1800 of 68,820
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article V bars extradition when the person sought has been convicted or acquitted in the Requested State for the same offense, but does not bar extradition if the competent authorities in the Requested State have declined to prosecute for the acts for which extradition has been requested. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am by ELEANOR MITCHELL
The Supreme Court concluded that, in both Carmichael and Rutherford, there was “no reasonable justification” for the Secretary of State’s position – there being no “sensible reason” for distinguishing between adults and children who could not share a bedroom due to disability, or  between adults and children needing overnight care (at [46]). [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
It stated that recognising a third gender would put HMPO “in isolation from the rest of government and society” and would result in administrative costs of about £2m being incurred. [read post]