Search for: "CONVERSE v CONVERSE" Results 1781 - 1800 of 15,423
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2022, 4:43 am by Peter J. Sluka
This means that if a departing partner takes a contingent fee case and subsequently litigates it to settlement or verdict, the dissolved firm is entitled to the value of the case at the date of dissolution, with interest, or, “[s]tated conversely, the lawyer must remit to his former firm the settlement value, less that amount attributable to the lawyer’s efforts after the firm’s dissolution” (Murov v Ades, 12 AD3d 654, 656 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:10 am by Michael Ehline
Court Justice Stephen Breyer was also quite the lively character, introducing a host of conversational topics that would liven the dead mood surrounding airtime lunches. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:01 am by Keith E. Whittington
I also wanted to discuss with him a separate blog post about the University of California president's official public statement regarding the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:17 am by ernst
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]