Search for: "D, Otherwise C. v. C" Results 1781 - 1800 of 4,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2009, 3:03 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
" 42 USC 2000e-16 includes the following employees and applicants: >military departments as defined in section 102 of Title 5 (i.e., The Department of the Army, The Department of the Navy and The Department of the Air Force) (this is referring to civilian employees - members of the military are specifically exempted in Section 7 of ENDA, also discussed below under subsection iii) >executive agencies as defined in section 105 of Title 5 (including employees and applicants for employment… [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:58 am
Div. 2007) (”if a party agrees to support a child beyond that otherwise required, a court must favor the agreement, in the interests of the child”); Hallberg v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
I have heard; Your Grace hath ta’en great pains to qualify His rigorous course; but since he stands obdurate, And that no lawful means can carry me Out of his envy’s reach, I do oppose My patience to his fury, and am arm’d To suffer with a quietness of spirit The very tyranny and rage of his. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
<> Senator Stabenow Honors John D. [read post]