Search for: "Davis v. State" Results 1781 - 1800 of 6,174
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Amr al-Azm, associate professor at Shawnee State University, drew attention to the importance of Syrian cultural heritage and the importance of non-state actors to preserve it. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am by Steve Vladeck
After unsuccessfully appealing his conviction and pursuing state collateral review, Ayestas filed a federal habeas petition in 2009, raising a series of claims – including that, under Wiggins v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Am. v ABB Power Generation, 91 NY2d 180, 186 [1997]; see 2138747 Ontario, Inc. v Samsung C & T Corp., 144 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
In fact, the 14th Amendment had been passed during the time of Davis’ indictment in the federal court system, when the case of United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:26 pm by daniel
Beginning with a California Supreme Court decision called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
At the UC Davis Law Review Online, Chad Flanders assesses the cert petition in Hidalgo v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 6:09 am
Posted by Ron Kaniel, University of Rochester Simon Business School, on Monday, October 2, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Agency costs, Asset management, Bonuses, Fund performance, Incentives, Institutional Investors, International governance, Management, Mutual funds, Pay for performance, Sweden Delaware’s Loss of Top Spot for Lawsuit Climate Posted by Ning Chiu, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Monday, October 2,… [read post]
And they also understand that the state’s ostensible goal—anti-pollution—could be more precisely accomplished by a law that is more directly tailored to the state’s purpose, a ban on littering (as the Court reasoned in Schneider v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 8:12 am by Derek T. Muller
Among those, just eight cite the most relevant texts: the Fourteenth Amendment (the basis for the finding that partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable under the Constitution in Davis v. [read post]