Search for: "Doe, Inc." Results 1781 - 1800 of 51,381
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2010, 9:24 am by The Docket Navigator
Apple, Inc., 6-08-cv-00447 (TXED September 28, 2010, Memorandum Opinion & Order) (Davis, J.) [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 12:04 am
However, the Court concurs with the Accused Parties that same motion practice is not automatically equated with progress in the litigation, and in this case, does not negate the fact that there have been no depositions, no documents exchanged, and, according to the Accused Parties, 'virtually no discovery other than discovery that the accused parties had to engage in related to the prior art.' " Yodlee, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:55 am by MBettman
., Inc., Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-474 (According to the Reporter’s Note, the case was actually decided on January 24, 2018, while Justice O’Neill was still on the Court, but released on February 8, 2018, after O’Neill had left the Court.) [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
Wildcard Systems, Inc., et al., No. 17-1483 (Does a breach-of-patent-license lawsuit arise under the Federal Patent laws?) [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 10:37 am
Goldstein does not address the visibility of the scar on the bridge of Plaintiff's nose, nor does he address the possibility of improvement with treatment. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
The court posited that without such utilization, there would be no grounds for the defendants to comment upon or draw attention to the BAYC NFTs.[13] Preservation of BAYC Mark Rights by Yuga: The defendants’ contention that Yuga either transferred its trademark rights to NFT purchasers or engaged in “naked licensing” was dismissed by the court.[14] The court reasoned that naked licensing does not apply in instances where no trademark license is in question, and since Yuga… [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 10:03 am
John Does 1 - 13," Patrick Collins, Inc. of Canoga Park, California ("Patrick Collins"), alleged direct and contributory infringement by 13 then-unidentified individuals including John Doe No. 7. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 2:13 pm
Does the average voter truly buy into the stated story that the 2.6 billion dollars spent on advertising for this presidential campaign was so that one side or the other will be responsible for creating more jobs, lowering unemployment, the deficit; or is it so that the funded party will do the behind the scenes beckoning of the special interest lobbyists? [read post]