Search for: "Doe Nos."
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
Therefore the AmeriKat does not understand how from the District Court's statement the second amici were able to hop, skip and jump from a basic position in US copyright law to a conception of moral rights. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:31 pm
Smith, Nos. 07-2732, 08-1993, 08-1994, 2009 U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
Nos. 07-15504, 08-15521. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:28 am
If someone does not convey real interest, we feel less guilty turning them down. -- Proofreading is a critical function of the job. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:53 am
Shabahang, Nos. 136617, 136653, and136983, in a 4 to 3 opinion authored by Justice Hathaway. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 5:46 am
But this does not mean that that these benefits must be maintained precisely at the level provided by the CBA in effect in 1998. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:27 pm
Michigan Catastrophic Claims Ass’n, Nos. 133466, 133468. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:35 pm
Michigan Public Service Comm’n, Nos. 281398, 281404. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 12:49 pm
In Jones, as in the present case, causation does not depend on statistical probabilities. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:49 am
Too bad this format does not seem to leave room for soloist encores. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:02 am
Patent Nos. 5,553,864 (the '864 patent) and 6,425,825 (the '825 patent), owned by David Sitrick, an individual inventor. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:35 pm
A summary eviction judgment does (and must) state the amount of past rent due, but it is not a judgment for damages enforceable by a writ of execution. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 9:45 am
Not only does it provide a mechanism for resolving disagreements between owners, but it also provides an orderly way to handle the death, disability, illness, bankruptcy, divorce, or retirement of one of the owners. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 8:48 am
What does that even mean? [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 12:05 am
My employer does know that I maintain this blog, and they have no issues with it. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:54 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral argument yesterday (mp3 podcast here) in In re Shinnecock Smoke Shop, Serial Nos. 78918061 and 78918500 (September 10, 2008) [not precedential]. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:46 am
Nos. 2007-5111, -5131, June 2, 2009. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
On the other hand, it has been suggested that the decision in Callery v Gray approving a figure as a reasonable premium in road traffic cases at the time has set that figure as a base-line and has resulted in the eradication of downward pressure in the market; and that the requirement for a Rogers v Merthyr Tydfil statement does not in practice ensure that premiums are competitive".Later the Report observes: "In Callery v Gray (Nos 1 and 2) [2002] UKHL 28 Lord Hoffmann… [read post]
25 May 2009, 3:34 pm
Copies of the cases summarized below may be secured from the Law Weekly for a small fee by calling 1-800-276-7427 and providing the PICS Nos. noted next to the case citations.Venue-Forum Non Conveniens-Plaintiff's choice of forum given deference-State Court rulingWalls v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 9:19 am
(See Fact Nos. 6, 13, 14, 15, 16) She was working full-time (See Fact No. 25, 29) and during both periods of employment had a company credit card, company office, cell phone, laptop, email account and voicemail. [read post]
