Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 36,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2010, 11:09 am
In 1996 decision Romer v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:52 am
The case is so near completion, however, that the Court finds that continued representation by [defense counsel] does not constitute not an 'unreasonable burden.'" The Walman Optical Company v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 1:58 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:00 pm
The question arises in Kucana v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 5:48 am
In a prior post, I discussed the Supreme Court case Travelers Casualty & Surety v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 7:03 am
If a guardian hires an attorney to represent the guardian (and his ward) does the ward eventually have standing to sue the attorney? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:26 am
Id. at *5 (citing Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:14 am
In the 2016 case of Woolworths (Pty) Ltd & Khayalethu Christopher Mabija Case No PA 3/14 the Labour Appeal Court appears to have revisit the principles set out in the Edcon v Pillemer judgment. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 2:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am
However, that decision does not permit a district court to simply disregard the express language of a statute that mandates attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 9:24 am
It's . . . not good.When an attorney's brief is so bad that the appeal gets dismissed, and the client thereby injured, my take is that the attorney should generally be sanctioned and/or reported to the State Bar.Yet the panel here apparently does neither.This is not an attorney who's just started practicing law. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
The Court of Appeal does not.I might add that I'd be interested to know whether counsel for the "winning" party below -- San Diego attorneys James McCabe, Robert Hamparyan and Jon R. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
Defense Attorneys: Tor B. [read post]
13 May 2009, 3:01 am
The new registration requirement and Law Society guidelines have in part been necessitated by the case of Revickzy v Melekinia. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 8:24 am
Loudoun County County Attorney’s Deletion of Constituent&rsq [read post]
14 May 2013, 12:19 pm
Wi-Lan Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
The case before the Court, Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:06 am
Furthermore, the complaint does not contain specific allegations that would place the plaintiffs within an exception to the privity requirement (see AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:45 am
California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
