Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 8,632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The action itself was a putative class action, one of several coordinated actions pending in Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 8:29 am
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled today on Christensen v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:54 am
Below is a brief summary of the issues before the Court: Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:23 am
, Lewis v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm
Superior Court: Does Penal Code section 1054.3, subdivision (b), as amended effective January 1, 2010, alter the existing provisions of law regarding court-ordered examinations of criminal defendants in sanity proceedings, specifically Penal Code sections 1026 and 1027? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:22 pm
” In Matter of Adoption of Unborn Child of B.W., W.G. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:01 am
The Appeals Court relied on Welch v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm
” Interestingly, despite Minnesota Power’s and the Commission’s assertions, the Order expressly differentiates the NTEC matter from North Dakota v. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 3:30 pm
” Interestingly, despite Minnesota Power’s and the Commission’s assertions, the Order expressly differentiates the NTEC matter from North Dakota v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 5:57 am
In Yemgas FZCO & Ors v Superior Pescadores SA [2016] EWCA Civ 101, the Court of Appeal considered whether the standard ‘Paramount Clause’ wording in the Congenbill incorporates the Hague Rules 1924 (the “HR”) or the Hague/Visby Rules (the “HVR”). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 4:08 am
Writ of prohibition not available to bar an executive action such as conducting an investigationMatter of Doe v Cuomo, 2010 NY Slip Op 02143, Decided on March 16, 2010, Appellate Division, Second Department“John Doe” initiated a CPLR Article 78 action seeking a writ of prohibition* to bar NYS Attorney General Andrew M. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:29 pm
K19C-03-023-CLS (Delaware Superior Court) the court held that no expert testimony was required. [read post]
Tabish v. Attorney General and the Legal Framework Governing Physical Coercion in ISA Interrogations
6 Dec 2018, 8:08 am
The latest Supreme Court decision, Tabish v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:33 am
While the statue lists the factors, the trial judge has the freedom to decide which factors are more important, and which factors are less important, in each individual case.Courts must consider the statutory factors when considering a relocation petition.The Superior Court (our appellate court) just affirmed (agreed with) the ruling of the trial court in Erie County, Pennsylvania denying a mother the opportunity to relocate from Erie County to Bucks County… [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 12:15 am
In Pratt v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
Doe, supra.Music Group Macao v. [read post]
Pa. Supreme Court Holds No Fiduciary Duty Created By Purchase of Insurance From Ameriprise Financial
2 Aug 2017, 6:41 am
The Superior Court reversed, however, and the Defendants appealed to the Pa. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 12:52 pm
And, relying on Dixon v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:40 am
Superior Court (2010) 184 Cal.App.4th 825, 844 [109 Cal. [read post]
