Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
If the applicant does not prove the case, no protection order is made.3. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:07 am
It has been widely reported that RIL prevailed by a majority of 2:1. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 3:04 pm
” The expert for Golden valued the company at only $88 per share and the petitioner came up with a value of $139 per share. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 4:27 pm
Administrative Code: 1. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:05 pm
The iPhone is now sold in 88 countries and is available on 151 carriers. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:38 pm
Case: Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 13.This appeal to the High Court is connected with Section 88(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1995. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 2:33 pm
And there's no better way to do that than to carefully read both of Judge Laughlin's scholarly and well-reasoned orders. [1] First Order: Does an ethics violation = undue influence? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
STANDARD OF REVIEW The Elder Abuse Act does not specify the standard of review to apply when reviewing protective orders granted under section 15657.03. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
We hold that it does not. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:10 am
When a right does not depend on a market good for its exercise, the right does not include a penumbral right to spend money. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 9:44 am
"Does Jessica's Law make anyone feel safer? [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:51 am
The exception was bankruptcy: Forty-two firms with assets of $1 billion or more filed for Chapter 11 protection in 2009. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:25 am
Holding #1: Keyword Ad Copy Must Sufficiently Distinguish the Trademark Owner This holding does not directly address Google’s liability; it only references the advertiser’s liability. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
No.47/96 Present: 1. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:34 pm
What implications does this have on the health care system? [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:46 pm
”*In this regard, the Senate is statutorily required to "maintain and make available for public inspection and copying . . . a record setting forth the name, public office address, title, and salary of every officer or employee" (Public Officers Law §88(3)(b), [emphasis supplied by the Appellate Division]). [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
In decision T 19/97, it is pointed out that it is necessary to distinguish between the material requirements for a transfer of the opponent status, cited in G 4/88, and their procedural effectiveness. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
Before it can decide on an auxiliary request, the ED has to examine the main request and all the auxiliary requests preceding said auxiliary request and decide on them (see T 484/88, T 169/96, T 1105/96). [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
My next post will address the costs, and it will then then compare the two. 1. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
It is, however, transferred in case of a complete legal succession (universal succession) to the legal successor, e.g. in the case of an incorporation (Eingliederung) or a merger of legal persons (T 475/88 [1]). [read post]
