Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 7,358
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2019, 1:11 pm
Deeply rooted in English common law, dating as far back as 1610, is the principle that judges cannot be paid from the fines they collect. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 12:24 pm
What happens when the defendants are a Spanish company and a Spanish individual, and the trade mark owners are British (and the exclusive licensee is an English company)? [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
It is not open to Member States to protect works of applied art on the basis that they have some aesthetic appeal in addition to their utilitarian appeal.Clothing designs will perhapsrarely pass the higher originality test. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 3:05 am
The court stated verbatim the following: It is true that both the English court and the Judge issuing the orders did not issue anti-suit injunctions. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:07 pm
Hacon HHJ noted that this judgment has significant persuasive effect on the English courts.However, UK academic opinion is divided on this topic. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
Related Musings:English v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm
As an example, she referred to the English case of Marinos v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:10 am
See here for a review by Judge Jürgen Schell (in German) and a review by Miquel Montañá (in English). [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm
EFF’s annual Pioneer Awards ceremony celebrates individuals and groups who have made outstanding contributions to freedom and innovation on the electronic frontier. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
” McFarlin v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
Supreme Court cases and other federal authority dating to 1828, cases from a dozen states and even English cases and commentary from the late 18th and early 19th Centuries. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 1:00 pm
The second referral, Sandoz v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:58 am
The appellants subsequently filed acknowledgement of service and stated they intended to contest the jurisdiction of the English court. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 7:04 am
There are three indicia for determining standing as explained by Cromwell J. for the Supreme Court of Canada in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:32 am
Lessons from English v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 8:59 am
(in English) The Grand Chamber judgment in the Naït-Liman v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 pm
“Tool Without A Handle: A Duty of Candor” The law and legal professional ethics require of counsel a duty of candor in the practice of law.[1] This includes a duty to not knowingly make false statements of fact, to not conceal controlling legal authority, and to not offer evidence the lawyer knows to be false.[2] These principles are considered essential to maintaining both substantive fairness for participants in the process, and trust in the integrity of the process for… [read post]
