Search for: "Edwards v. Means" Results 1781 - 1800 of 1,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
13 May 2009, 5:02 am
Yesterday the Court handed down one published opinion in the following case:PD-1616-07, Edward Esparza v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:25 am by Anthony Zaller
It is important to note that in California, it is extremely difficult for employers to enforce non-competition agreements due to a California Supreme Court ruling in Edwards v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:40 pm
Key ongoing internal project v. new client project. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:44 pm
I'll email you new articles when they come out.Note: Bold print and italics added by me.Judd Bagley colluded with his trusted friend Edward Manfredonia to spread vile anti-Semitic trash talk about Conde Nast contributing editor Gary Weiss and I. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 12:47 pm
Edwards, supra (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
Malcolm Feeley and Edward Rubin have just published an excellent book with the above title. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
General Municipal Law Section 209-m is operative only with respect to police departments having police officers in a negotiating unitParadiso v Loeffler, 2009 NY Slip Op 01986, Decided on March 17, 2009,The Village of Ocean Beach rejected Edward T. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:44 am
What does "social networking" mean to you? [read post]