Search for: "Eli Lilly " Results 1781 - 1800 of 2,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Egilman’s selective leaking of Eli Lilly documents was also a sore point. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
As our readers certainly know, the learned intermediary rule holds that prescription medical product warnings are to be directed to prescribing physicians rather than to end user patients. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 774 F.2d 830, 835 (7th Cir. 1985); Martinkovic v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Last week’s “breaking news” post on West Virginia’s statutory restoration of the learned intermediary rule started us thinking about how every state now has pro-learned intermediary precedent. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 1:29 pm by Bexis
Eli Lilly & Co., 113 F.3d 1426, 1429 (6th Cir. 1997) (“A federal court in a diversity case is not free to engraft onto ... state rules exceptions or modifications which may commend themselves to the federal court, but which have not commended themselves to the State in which the federal court sits”) (quoting Day & Zimmermann, Inc. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:55 am
| Book Review: Kerly’s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names | Thursday Thingies | Around the IP BlogsNever Too Late 204 [Week ending 28 Oct] Court of Appeal reaffirms UK as SEP litigation hotspot in upholding Birss J in Unwired Planet | Much Ado About FRAND: What you need to know about today's Court of Appeal Unwired Planet decision | AIPPI UK Rapid Response Event: Unwired Planet v Huawei - 13 November at 6PM | Lord Kitchin applies the "markedly different" infringement… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
Eli Lilly & Co., 44 Cal. 3d 1103 (1988), the court declined to apply the American Pipe rule to a personal-injury mass-tort action case arising from alleged product defects and negligence relating to a prescription drug. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| BEAUTY & THE BAY not an infringement of BEAUTY BAY, says High Court | US copyright registration for the Tommy Hilfiger Flag denied due to insufficient originality | The reemergence of issues surrounding copyright and the Australian Aboriginal Flag… | Gigi Hadid, Smile for the Copyright | Eli Lilly v Fresenius Kabi: a decision far from equivalent to what has been decided before | Re-establishment: An isolated error in a well-functioning system may not be equivalent to… [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
  The event blurb reads:"Jurisdictional issues have increasingly come to the fore in IP disputes in recent years, from Lucasfilm v Ainsworth and Actavis v Eli Lilly to FRAND disputes such as Unwired Planet v Huawei, Apple v Qualcommand Conversant v Huawei & ZTE, as parties clash on forum-shopping and attempts to reach one-stop resolution of their IP disputes. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 1:45 am by Rose Hughes
The written description requirement has been interpreted as requiring demonstration in the specification that the patent applicant "has invented species sufficient to support a claim to the functionally-defined genus" (Ariad v Eli Lilly). [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
 The infringement for the paper act of filing the ANDA for these purposes is designed to create an artificial act of infringement for the purposes of establishing jurisdiction in the federal courts (Eli Lilly v Medtronic (1990) and Glaxo v Apotex (2004)). [read post]