Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 1781 - 1800 of 15,512
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm by Michael Risch
Now, maybe there's nothing that could have been done about it, but I sure am glad that Microsoft's lawyer's figured this out in the Apple v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 9:09 am
[Volokh adds: This is based on the New York Times v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:07 am by Stephanie Sundier
Following this decision, the court later expanded actual malice to include “all defamed ‘public figures,'” in Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 12:15 pm
 Especially if that panel includes Judge O'Scannlain.It is, however, somewhat unusual for Judge Bybee to dissent from such a disposition and to argue that equitable tolling should apply.All that happens here.The majority, in an opinion authored by Judge Rawlinson, thought that the prisoner here sat on his butt and should have followed up more diligently with the California Supreme Court to figure out what was going on with his state habeas petition in that court. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:57 pm
 Particularly when you're claiming that this particular figure is required by the Constitution itself. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:54 pm
But at least none of them are literal (as opposed to figurative) 277-volt live wires. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:27 pm
Martin to talk with his counsel to figure out what the most beneficial probation arrangements would be. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
 The officer had sufficient cause to briefly detain the guy to figure out the scoop. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:06 pm
When I saw the caption to this opinion, I figured it'd be about that Travolta. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:52 pm
  Read the whole thing for the graphic details.You can't figure out from a cold appellate record, of course, whether the alleged victim or perpetrator is more credible. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:04 pm
 That you can add zeros at the end of a decimal figure without consequence.Nope. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 1:20 pm
  Needless to say, the picture of the defendant make him look bad -- it was his booking photo, which caught him mid-blink, so he looked weird and/or intoxicated -- and the picture of the victim made her look awesome (taken at a picnic or the like, with figurative rainbows and unicorns). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:46 pm
 No one else is in a better position to figure out what the right rule should be. [read post]