Search for: "German v. State" Results 1781 - 1800 of 3,142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
United States:  Actor James Woods is suing an anonymous individual for describing him as a “cocaine sniffer” on Twitter. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:15 am by Louis M. Solomon
Torre — German Discovery Rejected; Many Claims Dismissed Under Morrison (0) Rare FCPA Criminal Conviction Affirmed on Appeal (0) Ninth Circuit Refuses To Permit Case Involving Peppercorns and Trochus Buttons To Proceed Against the Sovereign State of Pohnpei (0) Morrison v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:52 pm
(Techdirt)   Germany German court rules that IP addresses are not personal information (Techdirt) Google Image search thumbnails 'infringement' under German ruling (Public Knowledge)   Netherlands Dutch Court imposes real-world punishment for virtual theft (Ars Technica)   United Kingdom IP and media regulation will be examined in digital review (Out-Law)   United States Campus Computing Project Study reveals costs of… [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:56 pm by Robert Chesney
  In United States v. al-Bahlul, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) continues the dangerous flirtation with the Nuremberg membership cases that it began with its Hamdan decision in June. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:07 pm by John Elwood
United States, 20-1410, and Kahn v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Court relied on, seemingly modified, and strengthened at least two existing elements of the test for conditional spending articulated in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
The National Socialist platform, adopted as official German state policy as of 1933, was committed to driving Jews and other “enemies of the State” out of economic life.This is the historical context in which modern claims to Nazi-looted art should be viewed.Too frequently, some of our judges seem to have forgotten history. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
United States Sarah Palin has lost her libel claim against the New York Times. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:01 am by Kevin Jon Heller
According to Tribunal V, the difference between an aggressive war and an invasion was that the latter did not involve armed resistance: [A]n invasion of one state by another is the implementation of the national policy of the invading state by force even though the invaded state, due to fear or a sense of the futility of resistance in the face of superior force, adopts a policy of nonresistance and thus prevents the occurrence of any actual combat. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 10:30 pm by INFORRM
As Lord Chief Justice Camden evocatively stated in Entick v Carrington (1765) 19 State Trials 1030, “the eye cannot by the laws of England be guilty of a trespass”. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:04 am
 Pix Credit HEREThe folks over at the Völkerrechtsblog have posted an excellent essay by Andrew Forde (Visiting Fellow at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, Galway). [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:13 am
"It's high time for those who wish to move forward with a higher form of cooperation to do so," said Peter Hintze, a German secretary of state. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:05 pm by Ingrid Wuerth
The International Court of Justice has issued its judgment in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
 Bear with me dear reader, as I recognise the gravity of disgreeing with all of Floyd LJ, Ryder LJ, Arden LJ and Arnold J.But not everyonedoes ...The problem this Kat has is that they all rely on the subjective state of the infringer, whether it is subjective intent, or knowledge, even if the knowledge is constructive knowledge. [read post]