Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,365
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 8:06 am
Blackmun and Antonin Scalia did in their dueling separate opinions in a 1992 abortion case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 7:18 am
George Voinovich (R-OH), both of whom have admitted the threat of global warming, today announced “a narrower competing bill” that resembles the weak legislation passed out of the Senate energy committee last year: George V. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:27 am
Preferences or other incentives could be given for “products manufactured using processes that minimize greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:24 pm
Circuit and is entitled Coalition for Responsible Regulation, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:27 am
Comer, et al. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:27 am
Comer, et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:46 am
Linda Greenhouse described the Justice as the last of an era “when a Supreme Court nominee didn’t have to check every box”: though he was nominated only two years after Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
The settlement was entered in Montana Environmental Information Center, et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 11:58 am
As Kevin Johnson noted earlier, Linda Greenhouse's column in the NY Times yesterday, made some wonderful points about the decision in Padilla v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Yet, in Sosa v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:38 am
” Briefly: Linda Greenhouse’s column for the New York Times’s Opinionator blog draws on the Court’s recent opinion in Padilla v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The city had completely ignored the potential environmental impacts from building more parking supply, which would likely lead to more cars, more congestion, more air pollution, and more greenhouse gas emissions. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 12:06 pm
According to EPA, the new standards will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 21 percent by 2030 from the light-duty vehicle fleet. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:27 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:27 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:15 pm
Ironically, the states’ position might well be saved by the Supreme Court’s controversial decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 3:55 am
It gives large facilities the time they need to innovate, governments the time to prepare to cut greenhouse gases . . . . [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:01 am
Part II consists of papers by Osofsky on Massachusetts v. [read post]
