Search for: "In Re William C."
Results 1781 - 1800
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2007, 11:55 am
Sharing of resources - curriculum, best practices; c. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 9:39 am
B. 241, 303 (C. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 1:20 pm
If you're getting tired of our stories about the DOJ's Shanetta Cutlar and S&C's Alexandra Korry, we have a new name to add to our rotation of delightfully high-powered, imperious females. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 5:30 am
Here's a quote in the piece from Joan C. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:20 am
§ 1712(a)-(c). [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:45 pm
This group either had Plans B and C considered ahead of time, or were fast adapters after running into a wall. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 9:59 am
If you're at Williams & Connolly, and anything changes on this front, please let us know. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 9:59 am
If you're at Williams & Connolly, and anything changes on this front, please let us know. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Garcia directed the RIAA to confer with the University of New Mexico with a view towards establishing a procedure to give all affected parties prior notice and an opportunity to be heard in connection with the motion.Once an ex parte order is granted, the RIAA issues a subpoena to the ISP, and gets the subscriber's name and address.The RIAA then discontinues its "John Doe" "ex parte" case, and sues the defendant in his own name in the district where he or she lives.Thus, at… [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:43 am
., In re William V., 4 Cal. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
Charles William Hess, Charles William Hess, Dublin, OH, for Defendants. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 3:35 am
"Lawyers look at the codification of legal services, and they're appalled by it," said David Briscoe, of Altman Weil. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
To see what this is all about, please read this Jurist piece by William Teesdale of the Federal Public Defenders Office in Portland, Oregon. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
** Why do you think they're so cold to that idea? [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 4:40 am
All of the above: Question one in columnist William Safire's "The Office Pool, 2007" asks:1. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 3:11 pm
Mark Naragon (NFP) James C. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 2:03 pm
(The antitrust claims are grounded in Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 2(c) of the Robinson-Patman Act.) [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 5:25 pm
Joan C. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 1:30 am
(C'mon, Senator Leahy, you're the incoming Senate Judiciary Chairman. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 10:52 pm
It's a sultry day on the Gulf Coast and you're feeling like William Hurt in Body Heat. [read post]
