Search for: "In re Grant"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 33,732
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2023, 4:05 pm
A federal appeals court undermined more than a century of First Amendment law by upholding a gag order that kept X—formerly known as Twitter—from discussing the government’s demand for Donald Trump’s account data, EFF argued in a brief urging a re-hearing. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:15 am
Res judicata is a final judgment on the merits. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:18 am
Update: Judge Walton ruled a re-trial is not barred. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
The defendants’ filed a petition for writ of certiorari, which the Supreme Court granted on June 28, 2010. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 1:39 pm
It's not known yet whether the Court will set all 17 of today's granted cases for argument in January, and hence will continue to have some sittings featuring more than the traditional two-arguments-per-day and some sittings with fewer, or whether the Court will use today's overflow to help re-establish the previous norm by holding several off until February. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 12:00 am
"Judge XYZ: "Well, what if, umm...we grant a motion? [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 11:55 am
In re Estate of Pittston, 2009-Ohio-1862 (5th Dist.) [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 6:20 pm
" Old regular crew: Ben Stevens, Finis Price, Grant Griffiths, and Victor Medina We're back and bringing the funny. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:05 pm
Florida Dep't of Environmental Protection, No. 08-11 (cert. granted. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:47 am
In re Teradata Corp., 223 USPQ 361, 362 (TTAB 1984). [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 7:10 pm
You’re finished with the process, right? [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 7:38 am
The case will now be re-considered during the December 7 Conference. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
(BTW, since we're allowed to appoint ourselves to the bench around here, Judge Carton's ruling granting Google's future motion to dismiss is AFFIRMED.) [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:33 pm
We’re counting down to Election Day with a series of seven videos, each a powerful illustration of why it’s so important to approve R-71. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 8:34 am
As David Oxenford wrote on our sister site, the Broadcast Law Blog, the FCC has granted an extension of time to submit comments in its proceeding to re-institute video description rules for television programming. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:32 pm
And now, you're gonna hear about it. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:42 am
They're going to be ensconced out by the airport -- just up the street from the Home Depot near I-205. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 1:52 pm
The Court of Chancery’s recent decision of In re: New Media Books and Records Action, C.A. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 7:12 am
In In re 21st Century Holding Co. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 8:26 am
We’re counting down to Election Day with a series of seven videos, each a powerful illustration of why it’s so important to approve R-71. [read post]
