Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 2" Results 1781 - 1800 of 1,947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm by Kit Walsh
In response to a petition signed by 114,000 people, the U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In re Lehman Brothers Securities & ERISA Litigation, 655 F. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am by Guest Blogger
Michael GreveA pending cert petition in S&M Brands v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:19 am by opadmin
The court may view the following charges as fraudulent: Luxury goods, services or purchases of $550 or more within 90 days before your petition was filed. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:58 am
Answer: The formal response for a divorce, separation or annulment petition. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:55 am by Jonathan Holbrook
Although a surety is permitted to file such a motion under the statute, it is a legal document and petition for use in court and therefore filing it constitutes the practice of law. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:49 pm by Rick
The circumstances and gravity of the offense alleged in the petition to have been committed by the minor. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm by Jon
The purposes of this Constitution include the following:1.1 To unite the peoples of the Band Republic into a permanent Union;1.2 To establish justice;1.3 To ensure domestic tranquility;1.4 To provide for the common defense;1.5 To promote the common welfare;1.6 To secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and to our posterity.For these purposes we the people hereby do ordain and establish this Constitution, providing that any official action inconsistent with them is void.2. [read post]
17 May 2009, 8:48 pm
  The Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) and Energy Efficiency Resource Standard (EERS) have been combined into one. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]