Search for: "Individuals 1-10" Results 1781 - 1800 of 27,537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Moreover, the term “person of a country of concern” mean any non-U.S. person who is also (1) a citizen or permanent resident of China, (2) a Chinese entity due to incorporation or headquarters, (3) the Chinese government (including its agencies and state-owned entities), (4) or any entity owned individually or in the aggregate, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by a person in (1)-(3). [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:23 am by HRWatchdog
It may then face an additional citation for failing to address the hazards that it failed to identify (under 6401.9(b)(10)), or ineffectively training employees regarding the issue it failed to identify (under 6401.9€(1)). [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 3:29 pm by Melody McDonald Lanier
Beyond being an unprecedented use of the statute, the indictment reaches far to qualify the activity in question as racketeering.Under Georgia law, racketeering includes false statements and writings or false lien statements against public officers or public employees in violation of Code Section 16-10-20 or 16-10-20.1. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:56 pm by Stephanie Ellis
§ 124.105(h)(1) restricts non-disadvantaged persons that are a general partner or stockholder with an ownership share of at least 10% in one 8(a) participant from owning more than a 10% interest in another 8(a) participant in the developmental stage, or 20% in the transitional stage. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm by Norman L. Eisen
To “act under color of such office” means that the individual was acting within their official capacity and authority as a federal officer. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:04 am by Phil Dixon
Davis, ___ F.4th ___; 2023 WL 4876392 (July 10, 2023; amended August 1, 2023). [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 10:30 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
  Top 10 Legal Developments in Bioethics and Public HealthThursday, October 12, 2023 2:30 PM – 3:45 PM ETEach year brings important legal developments related to bioethics. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:29 pm by Lyle Roberts
Without the Basic presumption, individualized issues of reliance would normally prevent any attempt to certify a class in a securities fraud class action. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 pm by Ryan Goodman
Solicitation of Violation of Oath by a Public Officer (Georgia Code 16-4-7(b), 16-10-1): 12/07/2020 The next charge against Trump is Solicitation of Violation of Oath by a Public Officer (Georgia Code 16-4-7(b), 16-10-1), dated to December 7, 2020. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 1:18 pm by Geoff Schweller
” Through the CFTC Whistleblower Program, qualified whistleblowers, individuals who voluntarily provide original information that leads to a successful enforcement action, are entitled to a monetary award of 10-30% of the funds collected by the CFTC in the enforcement action. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:34 pm by Adrian Santiago
Commercial vehicle accidents are jarring events that can leave individuals in a state of shock and confusion. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:29 pm by Vercammen Law
Therefore, you may wish to do the following:1) Have an Elder Law attorney prepare a Will to distribute your assets to the people you care about the most. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 12:09 pm by Vercammen Law
 SECOND Choice of Executor/Personal Representative in Power of Attorney:         This individual will serve in the event that the primary executor/personal representa [read post]
The activities of the Russian defendants may have violated Article 130 § 1 of the Polish penal code, which states, “Anyone who takes part in the activities of a foreign intelligence service against the Republic of Poland is liable to imprisonment for between one and 10 years. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 7:35 am by Norman L. Eisen
Grand jurors, however, are able to request additional evidence from prosecutors, including requests for certain individuals (including the named defendants) to testify if the grand jury believes it necessary to assist in their evaluation of the indictment. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:32 am by INFORRM
In their view, the application of French law was not foreseeable and the Court should have read Article 10 in light of Article 7 as the case concerns individual criminal liability for failure to ensure the prompt deletion of remarks made by third parties (para 2). [read post]