Search for: "Jones v. District Court"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
Farey Jones.) [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 am
Late yesterday Jones awarded Windsor $353,053 plus interest and costs and denied the advisory group’s motion to dismiss in Windsor v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Since that 2009 ruling, a handful of district courts have awarded punitive damages for the non-payment of maintenance and cure. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Today the Court released its decisi0n in HHS v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:54 am
The district court said that his speech was pursuant to his official job duties. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:59 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 12:23 pm
" Jones, 132 S. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 9:51 am
Jones was convicted and sentenced to a life sentence by the district court. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:42 am
Dow Jones & Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:50 am
" United States v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:21 am
It has been nearly 40 years since the Court in Bob Jones University v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:43 am
In Jones v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:29 pm
The District of New Jersey's recent ruling in Jones v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 5:21 am
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:00 am
See Jones v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 9:00 am
In circuits that had allowed warrantless GPS prior to Jones, courts have been allowing the use of GPS data obtained prior to Jones (see previous post here). [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:31 am
This Court is also not the first district court to confront the question of whether to apply the good-faith exception after Jones. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:17 am
The court relied on the three-pronged "effects" test to determine personal jurisdiction as set forth in the Supreme Court decision in Calder v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 8:17 am
The court relied on the three-pronged "effects" test to determine personal jurisdiction as set forth in the Supreme Court decision in Calder v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]