Search for: "LEE v. STATE" Results 1781 - 1800 of 4,501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
” At Legal Aggregate, Gregory Ablavsky weighs in on last week’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, the record does not demonstrate that the court was so vexed that it could not be impartial (22 NYCRR 100.3[E][1]; see Liteky v United States, 510 US 540, 555-556 [1994]; Hass & Gottlieb v Sook Hi Lee, 55 AD3d 433, 434 [1st Dept 2008]; People v A.S. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 8:48 am
Its most recent burial, only last Term, was, to be sure, not fully six-feet under: our decision in Lee v. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 2:05 pm by Jeff Welty
Lee Bailey & Kenneth Fishman, Handling Narcotic & Drug Cases § 131.2 (Feb. 2019 update) (citing State v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:17 am by INFORRM
Justice Lee’s decision followed a decision of the Full Federal Court in Joukhador v Ten Network Pty Ltd in 2021. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 5:00 am
Polhemus reviewed some of the information in the NCIS report, and provided Schrimpsher with a sample of a search warrant affidavit.Subsequently, Schrimpsher sought, and was issued, a search warrant by a state court judge.Schrimpsher, along with several other officers, including Polhemus, Detective Timothy Luckie of the Seattle Police Department, and Sergeant Lee Gaskill of the Algona Police Department, executed the search warrant. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0261p.06 2007/07/11 Parks v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:57 pm by Dennis Crouch
Rea graduated from Wayne State Law School in 1980 and has been practicing patent law for over 25 years. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 9:59 pm
More federalism in administering Atkins When the Supreme Court declared in Atkins v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lee Electric, Inc. v City of New York, 119 AD3d 652 (2d Dept 2014); Flowers v 73rd Townhouse, LLC, 99 AD3d 431 (JS1 Dept2012). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
 The Fourth Circuit noted that under the traditional jurisprudence as stated in Marshall v. [read post]