Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 21,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
At issue in this particular decision was the Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the Defendant to disclose excess carrier’s insurance information. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:53 am
It says that defendants cannot be liable for violating the law if the case law at the time of the alleged violation was not clear enough. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 7:51 am
When it comes to determining which injuries a defendant is responsible for compensating, courts look at whether the subsequent injury was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s negligence. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
Thus, the Court found that Teva was not a proper defendant as to the counts based on acts of infringement that occurred prior to Teva’s acquisition of Actavis. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:34 am
Establishing a Physician’s Liability for Harm Caused by a Third Party In analyzing the defendant PCP’s motion for summary judgment, the court stated that to obtain a dismissal of plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim, the defendant PCP must prove that she did not proximately cause the plaintiff’s alleged injuries. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
When he ruled, the judge claimed that the lawsuit brought against defendants was preempted by federal law, which states that generic manufacturers are not liable for providing better warnings than what the brand name manufacturers use. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 3:50 pm
In an April 27, 2018 opinion, the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland examined the question of whether a medical group was liable for the alleged negligence of an employee other than the physician-defendant. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 5:12 pm
The Ninth Circuit soundly rejected each of Perfect 10’s claims – clarifying that yes, direct copyright infringement still requires some volitional conduct on the part of the defendant, and no, Giganews could not be held liable for contributory or vicarious copyright infringement either. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 3:43 am
An attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legalresearch (see, Conklin v Owen, 72 AD3d 1006; McCoy v Tepper, 26 1 AD2d 592; Gardner v Jacon,148 AD2d 794, 796; Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645,646). [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:12 am
Because the defendants' behavior caused the public prosecutor to initiate criminal proceedings, the defendants were liable for costs. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:44 pm
In Brooktree, the Federal Circuit analyzed the defendant’s paper trail but held that “the sheer volume of paper” was not dispositive. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:44 pm
In Brooktree, the Federal Circuit analyzed the defendant’s paper trail but held that “the sheer volume of paper” was not dispositive. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:18 pm
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:18 pm
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:18 pm
In Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:33 am
The G-M G-J article also omits that fellow GHS Assistant Principal Green testified further in Gagnon that the attacker, Defendant James S. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:07 am
After all, it’s easy to understand the temptation felt by any wrongdoer to toss the stuff that can prove them liable for bad acts — and for paying large amounts of money in damages. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 3:53 am
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law of conviction, and Jesner v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 12:44 am
The Facts of the Case Allegedly, the decedent underwent a routine cholecystectomy at the defendant’s medical center. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:00 pm
Since that defendant failed to take timely action to determine the value of AA’s interest, and to issue the note, the AD1 thought the company was in breach of contract.But because AA failed to definitively establish the percentage of her ownership interest, the AD1 agreed that the motion court had correctly denied that branch of AA’s request which sought declaratory relief. [read post]
