Search for: "Long v. State"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 45,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2011, 6:40 am
In his statement to the court in State of Arizona v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 2:26 pm
The post First Degree v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Town of Greece v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:40 am
State v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 9:03 pm
In Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:31 pm
The Georgia State University College of Law will hold a one-day symposium on Friday, October 23, 2009, to mark the tenth anniversary of the United States Supreme Court's integration mandate in Olmstead v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 9:03 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:21 pm
(Orin Kerr) A petition for rehearing was recently filed in United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 11:38 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:02 pm
Long after the normalization of relations between the United States and Libya, some cases instituted for acts of terrorism remain in litigation. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:41 pm
In a landmark decision, the United States Supreme Court in Kentuckly v, King, Docket No.09-1272, held that warrantless searches are valid so long as a police officer knocks loudly, announces themselves and hears evidence being destroyed. [read post]
10 May 2016, 8:44 am
Additional Resources: State Farm v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court issued a long-anticipated decision in City of Ontario v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 4:35 am
In Taslimi v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:00 am
Burns v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 10:20 am
Notably, the topic of delayed IA investigations was touched on in a well-known Superior Court case entitled Aristizibal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:01 am
Chevron, U.S.A., Inc., 544 U.S. 528 (2005) informed us that the "substantially advance a legitimate state interest" test was one of substantive due process, not regulatory takings, the courts began revisiting the long-neglected topic of substantive due process in the land use context. [read post]
