Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 1781 - 1800 of 20,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2022, 3:22 pm by Eileen McDermott
The United States Solicitor General has recommended granting review in American Axle & Manufacturing v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 5:48 pm
United States, today Judge Kozinski makes clear that "failing to name an appellee in an NOA is not a bar to an appeal. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
In the case, a Michigan federal district court issued a preliminary injunction preventing Iraqi nationals (many of whom are Chaldean Christians) subject to long-standing deportation orders from being removed from the United States while they attempt to convince immigration courts that their return will subject them to persecution, torture and possible death. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:15 am by Steve Brachmann
H&H Wholesale Services, Inc., the appellate court’s latest decision in a nearly decade-long trademark case over the unlawful diversion of international diabetes test strips into the United States for sale. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 9:15 am by Steve Brachmann
H&H Wholesale Services, Inc., the appellate court’s latest decision in a nearly decade-long trademark case over the unlawful diversion of international diabetes test strips into the United States for sale. [read post]
9 May 2023, 10:00 am
It may not be exactly right to say that this issue has been “percolating” for a long time; the federal courts of appeals have treated it as having been resolved by the Supreme Court’s per curiam opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:35 am by Nancy Braman
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit last week affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded a decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) in the long-running case of VirnetX Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:25 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, __ M.J. __, Misc. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 7:11 am
("On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) admitted into evidence an out-of-court statement of the victim, violating his rights secured under the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment to the United States constitution, as articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Crawford v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:57 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the appeal of Stanford University against Roche Diagnostics. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:07 am by Isaul Verdin, Immigration Lawyer
The result of Vartelas is basically that LPRs with convictions prior to April 1, 1997 can generally take innocent, casual and brief trips outside the United States without jeopardizing their LPR status upon return to the United States. [read post]