Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V" Results 1781 - 1800 of 8,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2014, 8:00 am by Tony Allen
Indeed, in responding to one invitation, the defendants reportedly went so far as to acknowledge being aware of the penalties that might be imposed for unreasonable refusal, but said:“[W]e are confident that in a matter in which our clients are extremely confident of their position and do not consider that there is any realistic prospect that your client will succeed, the rejection is entirely reasonable. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm by Wolfgang Demino
LoBiondo, Patterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, pro hac vice, Joshua Kipnees, Patterson Belknap Webb and Tyler LLP, pro hac vice & Peter W. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 8:30 am
"Judge Williams came back in her opinion with a quote from then-Judge Roberts: "[W]e should adhere to the 'cardinal principal of judicial restraint,' that 'if it is not necessary to decide more, it is necessary not to decide more.' PDK Labs., Inc., v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am by bndmorris
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Thus, a cause of action for a declaratory judgment, not a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, was the proper vehicle to seek relief (see Matter of Huntington Hills Assoc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d 647). [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:06 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Thus, a cause of action for a declaratory judgment, not a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, was the proper vehicle to seek relief (see Matter of Huntington Hills Assoc. v Town of Huntington, 49 AD3d 647). [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:51 am by Edith Roberts
At The Daily Caller, Kevin Daley reports that “Judge Brett Kavanaugh cannot explain two-thirds of his recusals from matters before the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Property v. liability rules. [read post]