Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 5,344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Andrew P. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Andrew P. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:08 am
In Béland , supra , McIntyre J., speaking about the inadmissibility of a polygraph test, cited at p. 415 Davie v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:38 am
California courts have declined to find a duty as a matter of law … for claims implicating expression. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:57 pm
Justice Minister Lord McNally has proposed an amendment that reads: “Clause 43 Page 30, line 30, leave out from “not” to end of line 32 and insert “prevent a costs order including provision in relation to a success fee payable by a person (“P”) under a conditional fee agreement entered into before the day on which that subsection comes into force (“the commencement day”) if - (a) the agreement was entered into specifically for the purposes… [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:48 am
(Boundy.2018.BadGuidance) Colleen Chien and Jiun-Ying Wu, Decoding Patentable Subject Matter, 2018 PatentlyO Patent Law Journal 1. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:00 pm
In the 1990s, the answer turned out not to matter. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
The matter has been extensively briefed (Doc. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:46 am
This, by the way, was after the parties had reached a conciliation agreement that supposedly resolved the matter. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
(b) an incompetent. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 10:36 am
In this matter, the defendant/father has three children, each with different mothers. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 10:12 am
This concluding paragraph appears at p. 26: On what ground would anyone have us leave Mr. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:03 pm
Woldow and Douglas B. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
In many cases you can say that you just don’t have copyright over the matter claimed.Ramsey: interacts w/remedy: suppose P is trying to cover facts; is entire copyright invalid? [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:58 am
For that reason LM v Medway Council (2007) EWCA Civ 9, (2007) 1 FLR 1698, R v B CC Ex p P (1991) 1 WLR 221 CA (Civ Div), P (A Minor) (Witness Summons), Re (1997) 2 FLR 447 CA (Civ Div) and W (Children) (Care Order: Sexual Abuse), Re (2009) EWCA Civ 644, (2009) 2 Cr App R 23 should be overruled. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 10:05 pm
Smaller corporate legal departments, fed up with the high cost of mainstream corporate matter management systems will repurpose private-firm oriented case management systems such as PracticeMaster, TimeMatters, Client Profiles, etc. to use them as matter managers … at a fraction of the cost at a time when legal department IT budgets will be slashed to the bone. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:07 am
That the voters explicitly imposed a procedural two-thirds vote requirement on themselves in [Article 13 C, Section 2(d)] is evidence that they did not implicitly impose a procedural timing requirement in subdivision (b).8 The court called this quote “ambiguous dictum” at best, and stated “this language appears to imply that the voters imposed the two-thirds voting requirement on themselves only with respect to taxes placed on the ballot by local government (e.g., in San… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
But it’s not there b/c of property rights. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
§ 360c(b)(2). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
P. 37.02(B), an order prohibiting a party from introducing matters into evidence is one of the available remedies for a violation of an order made pursuant to Tenn. [read post]
