Search for: "MILLS v. STATE"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
” Take, for example, his statement that Burwell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:03 pm
Supreme Court explained in 1931 in Near v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Cox:As provided by Title 28, Section 508(B) of the United States Code and Title 28, Section 0.132(A) of the Code of Federal Regulations, I have today assumed the duties of Acting Attorney General.In that capacity I am, as instructed by the President, discharging you, effective a [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
" Judge Bramlette stated that the requested fees were excessive given the fact that this was a “run-of-the-mill state law case. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 5:07 am
The case is called Johnson and Aguaiza v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 7:26 am
Several pre-selected opinions (Loving v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:47 am
A public comment period on the proposal is now underway, This week saw the Fourth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:20 am
IntroductionThe Supreme Court of Papua New Guinea (“SCPNG”)’s recent decision in Namah v Pato [2016] PGSC 13; SC1497 (“Namah”) found the detention of asylum seekers (transferred from Australia to Papua New Guinea [“PNG”]) in a ‘regional processing centre’ on Manus Island to be ‘unconstitutional and illegal’. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:09 pm
“Pursuant to CPLR 4111 (c), when the answers on a verdict sheet ‘are inconsistent with each other and one or more is inconsistent with the general verdict, the court shall require the jury to further consider its answers and verdict or it shall order a new trial,’” wrote the panel, quoting Marine Midland Bank v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:47 pm
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 5:00 pm
Miles Medical Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
He seeks to make it easier to remove foreclosure defense actions from state to federal court, ending state court limited jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Jeffords v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 4:24 am
” Estate of Frankl v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
Just ten years ago, derivative litigation was dominated by securities class action tag-along suits and run-of-the-mill corporate waste and mismanagement claims. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm
In short, the NCD and Office of the NCD would resemble the structure of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, albeit with a smaller scale. [read post]
