Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 5,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2021, 8:00 am
Mark resides in Cleveland Heights, OH. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
Today in Case C? [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am
Contemporary design/designers at the time thought their design was good b/c the functionality was completely integrated into the look. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:19 am
Congress wrecks the Internet with SOPA/PROTECT-IP, 17 USC 512(c) still matters a lot to the Internet ecosystem, and this ruling has a lot of good news for web hosts. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 1:11 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:07 am
Our good friend Alberto Bellan has been kept particularly busy in composing this weekly round-up (our eleventh) of blog posts which you may have missed if you were away last week. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Consumer is less a delimiter in US scholarship than the licensor of expansion, b/c consumer perception is malleable when you have good counsel. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
The respondent company’s defence alleged that the appellant’s actions amounted to an abuse of their rights under the Trade Mark Directive, and that they also breached Community law protecting free movement of goods between EU member states and competition law. [read post]
31 May 2011, 1:44 pm
c) deletion of the "extra" two months period for setting out the grounds of appeal. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:07 am
See TBMP Sections 405.04(b), 406.04(c), and 410. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:18 pm
The program states that:"Much of the commentary on the recent trade mark reforms has focused on the big ticket items – such as the change in the name of the Office, IP TRANSLATOR and goods in transit. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
| Danish Supreme Court in Würtz v Coop confirms existence of "de minimis" copyright exception for use of applied art in marketing materials | Swedish Patents and Market Court of Appeal finds request for blocking injunction against ISP disproportionate | General Court refuses DeepMind's trade mark for STREAMS | POSTAUTO: Acquired Distinctiveness for Non-Core Goods and Services? [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
: English translation of Dutch Supreme Court decision in MSD v Teva highlights UK Supreme Court's Actavis decision I Student essays: how to write a good piece? [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
Do good with your consumption! [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:45 am
The European Court of Justice has given its ruling this morning in Case C-239/05 BVBA Management, Training en Consultancy v Benelux-Merkenbureau, a reference from the Brussels Court of Appeal for a preliminary ruling on several issues of European trade mark law. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 4:08 am
(I bet S&M believe the internet does more harm than good, at least to their reputations ! [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:26 am
Good; fine. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 12:06 pm
New Jersey’s audit law was pretty good for its time, but RLAs are more effective and it would be a good idea to update the law. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
However, as Mike Mireles points out, this could still be good news for the EPIPEN trade mark. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
The question before the Court is this:"Must Article 5(1) of Directive 89/104 be interpreted as meaning that the adoption, by a third party without authorisation, of a registered word mark, as a company name, business name or style in connection with the marketing of identical goods, amounts to use of that mark in the course of trade, which the proprietor is entitled to stop by reason of his exclusive rights? [read post]
