Search for: "Mark C. Good" Results 1781 - 1800 of 5,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2019, 9:46 am
| Danish Supreme Court in Würtz v Coop confirms existence of "de minimis" copyright exception for use of applied art in marketing materials | Swedish Patents and Market Court of Appeal finds request for blocking injunction against ISP disproportionate | General Court refuses DeepMind's trade mark for STREAMS | POSTAUTO: Acquired Distinctiveness for Non-Core Goods and Services? [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
Martins responded that further TSCM sweeps were unnecessary because the joint task force (JTF) had operated in good faith to facilitate attorney-client communications and the command had self-reported the few genuine problems and worked to remediate those. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:43 am
Consumers were confused as to commercial origin; therefore there was clearly use for the purpose of distinguishing the goods in question (per Céline). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
This is a case with a very good shot of being heard by the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 1:05 am
The perception of the marks by the average consumer of the goods or services in question plays a decisive role in the global assessment and that consumer normally perceives a mark as a whole without engaging in details (OHIM v Shaker, C-334/05).Having said that, with regard to the visual similarities of the signs, the GC considered that these are similar to the extent that they share a figurative element depicting an anthropomorphic animal with a round head and a… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:33 am
| Danish Supreme Court in Würtz v Coop confirms existence of "de minimis" copyright exception for use of applied art in marketing materials | Swedish Patents and Market Court of Appeal finds request for blocking injunction against ISP disproportionate | General Court refuses DeepMind's trade mark for STREAMS | POSTAUTO: Acquired Distinctiveness for Non-Core Goods and Services? [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 4:00 pm by Bill Marler
Pilgrim ordered lab work, which soon returned results showing a normal platelet count, hemoglobin, and urinalysis; a test for fecal leukocytes was negative, and stool studies for toxigenic C. difficile and culture were pending. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:29 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark A MOTHER'S TOUCH MOVERS for "transportation of household goods for others" [MOVERS disclaimed], finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark A WOMAN'S TOUCH MOVING for "moving and storage of goods; moving company services" [MOVING disclaimed]. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:14 am
In re Cerveceria Primus, S.A. de C.V., Serial No. 87460794 [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 6:56 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
For instance, procurement of 10 crores worth stationery for consumption by central government (end-in-itself) is totally different from procurement of goods for manufacture by a central PSU (means to an end). [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:39 am
The fact that Nike uses its mark on a variety of goods also weighed in its favor.Conclusion Regarding Section 2(d): The Board sustained the Section 2(d) claim.Dilution by Blurring: Applying the non exclusive factors of Section 1125(c)(2)(B)(i-vi), the Board wasted little time in finding the marks to be similar and Nike's mark to be inherently distinctive. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:44 am by Bill Marler
A preliminary test for toxigenic C. difficile was negative, and there were fecal leukocytes[1], but the other stool studies were pending. [read post]