Search for: "Mark Case" Results 1781 - 1800 of 70,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 9:48 pm by Sme
., May 23, 2016) (affirming dismissal for failure to state a claim because Kerkhoff failed to challenge some of the district court’s rationales for the order of dismissal)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:42 pm by Sme
., December 6, 2016) (affirming the SEC's disciplinary suspension of McCune (resulting in his being 'permitted to resign' from his employment) because he failed to ‘observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade’)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 11:15 pm by Sme
., April 13, 2017) (affirming denial of benefits because evidence supported credibility determination, medical opinions were properly weighed, and Thomas's claim of disabling pain was adequately evaluated)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
21 May 2016, 2:51 am by Sme
., May 9, 2016) (affirming ALJ determination that Smith was not disabled)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
First, the Federal Circuit addressed several Supreme Court trade dress cases it found relevant to whether a color mark on packaging can be inherently distinctive: In Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:29 am
  As Mr Justice Arnold said in paragraph 1 "[t]he case raises important issues of European trade mark law", which necessitates references to the CJEU on issues relating to (i) bad faith for filing with no intention to use and (ii) IP TRANSLATOR clarity issues. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
If the colour yellow (‘with or without the word’) has come to signify print and online directories, then consumers and traders may in some cases come to understand the word describing the colour to signify them as well.Section 44 – identical trade marks? [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 12:07 am
As technology changes, shouldtrade mark owners be able to amend trade mark registrations? [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 12:30 am by Dave Wieneke
In the case of whiskey, it may be familiarity, tradition, even stability. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
Irish trade mark cases continue to fascinate the connoisseur, since there is nowhere quite like the Emerald Isle for those curious encounters where grit meets glamour (as where the men from Monte Carlo take on a fish and chip shop from County Monaghan, here) and where a couple of Marie Claires can get their claws out and have a real cat-fight, as happened here. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 8:33 am by Afro Leo
Monday's discussion takes us north to the Court of Justice of the European Union which provided its opinion this week on whether the shape of Nestle's almost century old Kit-Kat bar is registrable as a trade mark. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This case serves as a reminder for employers that even though an employee's religious beliefs may seem strange, as long as those beliefs are sincerely held, the law requires that employers accommodate them absent undue hardship. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 2:16 pm by Rebecca C. Morgan Stetson Law
The National Center on Law & Elder Rights is offering a free webinar on September 10, 2019 at 2 p.m. edt on Legal Basics: Representing a Client in a Defense of Guardianship Case. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
 Most of these cases have involved trade marks, trade dress and passing off. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:02 am
The was asked by British based KNUT IP Management Ltd to annul the decision of OHIM's First Board of Appeal of the Office of 17 March 2010 in Case R 650/2009-1. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:58 am by Adam Weinstein
In cases of selling away the investor is unaware that the advisor’s investments are improper. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:32 am by Adam Weinstein
Our firm is investigating claims made by The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) against broker Mark Schklar (Schklar). [read post]