Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 9,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Maples v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Last Best Beef, LLC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:50 am
City of Philadelphia, Medina v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm
Background and analysis of the Judgment are provided by Comparative Patent Remedies.In the United States, there is a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 10:42 am
” A recent case from the United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals held that a trade name can be “distinct” when it incorporates two generic terms which are not typically linked together. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:30 pm
Knotts and United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 10:08 am
The United States Shoe Corporation was an appeal from a decision of the Opposition Board which refused registration of THE INVINCIBLES for use in association with "eyeglass lenses" and related wares on the basis that it was confusing with the opponent's mark, INVISIBLES for "ophthalmic (sic) lenses". [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 3:43 am
Hov IP II, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:04 pm
The Court ruled, instead, that “all the relevant conduct took place outside the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 5:20 am
Shire United States, Inc., CA NO. 08-941 2009 U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
[www.oranous.com][www.oranous.com] No. 07-5439 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States RALPH BAZE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:45 pm
Chicago, I demonstrated that the decision is a voting paradox, illustrated the paradox, and explained why the "narrowest grounds" rule of Marks v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The best way to do this is through the extensive literature on state capacity and development, much of it new since Ackerman’s original efforts, to establish a legally plausible baseline for marking out later informal constitutional changes. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
Said the Court, the high rating position of links to the CTM proprietor’s website could be justified in the light of the earlier mark’s well-known character in the United States; they did not show that EU consumers were familiar with the earlier mark, given that no evidence was provided of its market share, of how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing its use was, of the investment in its promotion and of how significant a… [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 3:59 am
Wirecard AG v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 5:43 am
He then cited to some of the landmark cases involving homosexuality such as Bowers v Hardwick [the 1986 case that upheld Georgia's criminalization of certain homosexual acts]; Lawrence v Texas [the 2003 decision overruling Bowers]; and of course, United States v Windsor [striking down as unconstitutional the federal Defense of Marriage Act which defined a marriage as solely between one man and one woman in the federal benefits context].Justice… [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am
For this blog’s Academic round-up, Amanda Frost examines some of the academic commentary on the Fourth Amendment’s applicability to GPS surveillance, an issue the Court will take up in United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
See also United States v Power, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 20-po-331-GLS), 2023 WL 131050, and United States v Robertson, unpublished memorandum opinion of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, issued January 9, 2023 (Case No. 22-po-867-GLS), 2023 WL 131051, *12 ("[T]he Court… [read post]
