Search for: "Maryland v. United States"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2016, 8:52 am
United States, 309 US 323 (1940). [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm
And “no matter how the broader issue of” whether courts should generally review partisan-gerrymandering claims is resolved, they contended, this is such an easy case that the 2016 plan cannot stand: North Carolina Republicans had an “official state policy to maximize” their party’s representation in Congress, and under the plan Republicans in 2016 won 10 out of the state’s 13 congressional seats “even though the statewide vote was nearly… [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 1:28 pm
Snyder v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 6:18 am
In his Verdict column for Justia, Vikram David Amar analyzes the issue of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG)’s standing in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 10:53 am
" In Maryland v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
United States, 116 U. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:29 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:15 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion for a 6-3 Supreme Court majority in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:00 pm
Maryland: Maryland amends its state Fair Employment Practices Act to prohibit discrimination based on military status. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
Maryland, and Osborn v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 10:55 am
” In Maryland v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:28 am
” At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the recent cert grant in Benisek v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:36 am
United States (1934). [read post]
4 May 2007, 10:42 pm
Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
United States, 13-632. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
State Bar of California and Lathrop v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant of impeding the administration of the tax code, the government must prove that the defendant knew of or could have foreseen a tax-related proceeding. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
United States. [read post]
